Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1199/2016

Case between Suhara Beevi et al vs Kurian Thomas regarding execution petition

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-17
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves decree holders Suhara Beevi, Beeny Thomas, and Jose Sebastian pursuing an execution petition against the judgment debtor, Kurian Thomas. The court heard the petition and recorded full satisfaction on the delivery.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has passed the order granting full satisfaction of the decree in favor of the decree holders. The delivery of the decree was effectively completed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court has passed the order granting full satisfaction of the decree in favor of the decree holders. The delivery of the decree was effectively completed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court recorded that the delivery was effected and full satisfaction was recorded from the execution petition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court recorded that the delivery was effected and full satisfaction was recorded from the execution petition.
Supporting Evidence
The court pronounced that full satisfaction was recorded on the same day.

Judgment Evidence:

Delivery effected. Full satisfaction recorded.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suhara Beevi
Party Age
70
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Beeny Thomas
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jose Sebastian
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kurian Thomas
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. T Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kabil T. Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Prasanna B.T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Haseena K.U
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Krishob K. Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sheeba Mariam J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Suhara Beevi et al vs Kurian Thomas regarding execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between Suhara Beevi et al vs Kurian Thomas regarding execution petition

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Mahendra Kumar. C vs Suresh. V. Varghese regarding E.P No. 199/2023
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Cornation Curries Private Limited vs Happy Varghese et al regarding E.P No. 31/2020
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Shamughapuram Co-operative Bank Limited vs Sumathy Vijayan regarding execution petition
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Manager, DTDC Express Limited et al regarding decree satisfaction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won