Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 21 / 2018

Case between Sudharmma A.M vs Latha K.B regarding money realization

Court
The Munsiff Court of Kolenchery
Judge
Smt. Sirsha NA
Order Date
2025-02-14
Duration
Case Closed
Fri, 02/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a plaintiff who loaned money to the defendant, who failed to repay as promised. Plaintiff sued for recovery of the loan.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed, and the defendant was directed to return the document produced by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed, and the defendant was directed to return the document produced by the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiffs' Exhibits: A1 21.06.2016 Promissory Note A2 17.04.1989 Pattayam bearing No.PF 19/89 A3 18.03.2013 Death certificate issued by Poothrikka Grama Panchayat. A4 12.02.2018 Relationship certificate

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sudharmma A.M
Party Age
58
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Latha K.B
Party Age
44
Plaintiffs Documents
Promissory Note dated 21.06.2016, Pattayam bearing No.PF 19/89, Death certificate issued by Poothrikka Grama Panchayat, Relationship certificate dated 12.02.2018
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Recovery of Rs.3,50,000 from defendant
Evidence:
Defendant's version deemed more plausible due to lack of evidence on plaintiff's side
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Claim for possession of Ext. A2 allowed
Evidence:
No order as to costs - plaintiff directed to return pattayam bearing No. PF 19/89 (Ext A2) to defendant

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff relied on it to support the claim, but signature not belonging to defendant discredited the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Pattayam
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff claimed it as security for debt, but not regarded as such without a written agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A2 to Ext.A4
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Not mentioned
Reference:
Document Type: Relationship Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Handed over by defendant as part of assurance
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: FSL Examination Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to disprove plaintiff's claim on signature authenticity
Reference:
Ext.X1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Recovery of Money
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sudharmma A.M vs Latha K.B regarding money realization
Case Code Year
Case between Sudharmma A.M vs Latha K.B regarding money realization

Quick Facts

Location
Kolenchery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Case Filed
Case Closed
Fri, 02/14/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
60%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between A. C Sasikumar vs Santhosh Thomas regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India, Kolenchery Branch, St.Peter's College Trust Building vs Rahul Raju regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India, Kolenchery Branch, St.Peter's College Trust Building, et al vs Rahul Raju regarding money realization
MUNSIFF AT KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shibi Baby W/o Baby Joseph vs George S/o Paulose regarding declaration and injunction
THE MUNSIFF AT KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shibi Baby, W/o Baby Joseph et al vs George S/o Paulose regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won