Case Summary
Sudhakaran E K is the plaintiff, while Ammalu E K and others are the defendants. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and not represented in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation. All interim orders passed were vacated.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear or represent the case in court, leading to dismissal.
The plaintiff failed to appear or represent the case in court, leading to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear or represent the case in court, leading to dismissal.
The plaintiff failed to appear or represent the case in court, leading to dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and not represented, leading the court to conclude that there was no intention to proceed with the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default. All interim order passed stand vacated.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sudhakaran E K
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ammalu E K
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- W/o Late Babukutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Preetha E K
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- W/o Sujith K V
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Preethy
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- W/o Santhosh M R
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Preeni Mol C B
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- W/o Sunil Kumar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Prineesh C B
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o Late Babukutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Surendran N G
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Biju Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sreejith S Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence court is satisfied that plaintiff is not intending to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sudhakaran E K vs Ammalu E K et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Sudhakaran E K vs Ammalu E K et al regarding dismissal for default