Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 459/2025

Case between Sudarshan P B vs Returning Officer et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-12-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sudarshan P B initiated a suit against the Returning Officer and others related to an election matter. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was absent and did not intend to proceed. All interim orders were vacated.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was absent and did not intend to proceed. All interim orders were vacated.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and had not taken any steps to continue the litigation.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and had not taken any steps to continue the litigation.
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed. All interim orders shall stand vacated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sudarshan P B
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Returning Officer, FEFKA Executive Union Governing Body Election 2025-2027
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Secretary, FEFKA Executive Union
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
FEFKA Executive Union, Represented by the Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mohammed Ziyad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C K Lohithakshan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saifunniza V
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of intent to proceed.
Evidence:
Satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sudarshan P B vs Returning Officer et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sudarshan P B vs Returning Officer et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won