Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 361/2015

Case between Subrahmanyan vs Thankamani et al regarding property delivery

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Sri. Vincy T.V.
Order Date
2017-08-31
Duration
1 year, 10 months, 12 days
Case Code No.
361
Case Closed
Thu, 08/31/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Subrahmanyan, the decree holder, filed a case against Thankamani and multiple other judgment debtors seeking delivery of the property. The court ordered the property to be delivered and closed the Execution Petition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the delivery of the property and closed the Execution Petition.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property Delivery
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the delivery of the property and closed the Execution Petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Property delivered. Delivery recorded. EP closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Subrahmanyan
Party Age
53
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thankamani
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijayalakshmi T.V.
Party Age
56
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hariharasudhan
Party Age
49
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lakshmi T.V.
Party Age
64
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Krishnaswami
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saraswathi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasikala
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Preethi G Nair
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasi G Nair
Party Age
35
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Girija
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreedevi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Baby
Party Age
45
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kousalya
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Latha Jyothi
Party Age
35
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Property Delivery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ordered the delivery of the property.
Evidence:
Property delivered. Delivery recorded. EP closed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2015

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 11/03/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 08/31/2017 - 12:00
From
Tue, 08/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Thu, 08/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Thachoth Ayamma et al vs Alukkal Koya regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Illyas vs Thahira-R1 regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff-Magistrate
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Amina et al vs Kunhibava et al regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Chandran vs Sulochana regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Aboobakar vs Abdul Salam et al regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won