Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 209/2022

Case between Subeesh V S vs Joseph N X et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-10-16
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Subeesh V S as the first defendant and Joseph N X along with KSEB, the Assistant Engineer, and Kerala Water Authority as plaintiffs. The dispute centers around claims of property rights and the use of a pathway for access.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for a joint trial of OS. 209/2022 with OS. 231/2022 to avoid conflicting decisions and promote efficient resolution of issues regarding property rights.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Joint trial of OS. 209/2022 with OS. 231/2022
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that both suits involve the same issues and evidence concerning property rights.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Petition is allowed. 1) OS. 209/2022 is ordered to be tried jointly with OS. 231/2022.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Joseph N X (56 years years) Naduvil Manackal House, Chittoor P O, Ernakulam – 682 027 KSEB (Age not specified years) Vaidyuthi Bavan, Patto P O, Thiruvananthapuram, Represented by its Chairman and Managing Director – 695 004 The Asst. Engineer, KSEB (Age not specified years) Electrical Session, Cheranalloor – 682 027 Kerala Water Authority (Age not specified years) Jalabavan, Nandavanam, Thiruvananthapuram, represented by its Managing Director – 695 033

Defendants

Subeesh V S (45 years years) Vattathil House, Divine Nagar, South Chittoor, Cheranalloor Village, Ernakulam – 682 207

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
OS.209/2022 is ordered to be tried jointly with OS. 231/2022.
Evidence:
In light of the above discussion I therefore find that this petition deserves to be allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases