Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 688 /2022

Case between Subair vs Sundaram Finance Limited regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany.
Order Date
2024-07-02
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Subair, aged 70, filed a suit against Sundaram Finance Limited for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff decided not to proceed with the matter further, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as not pressed and settled, with both parties bearing their respective costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

In the result suit is dismissed as not pressed and settled.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Subair (70 years years) Kodungookkaran House, Pulikkan Centre, Chendrappini, Thrissur District, Pin – 680 687.

Defendants

Sundaram Finance Limited (Age not specified years) Registered office-21, Patullos Road, Chennai – 600002. Manager, Sundaram Finance Limited (Age not specified years) The Monarch First Floor, Ernakulam, Cochin -11.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit is for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
The counsel for plaintiff filed not press memo. Hence the plaintiff does not intend to proceed the matter further.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases