Case Summary
This case involves St.Mary’s Convent filing a suit against Saidhu Mohammed and others. The court has accepted a compromise agreement with certain clauses excluded from the decree.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decree in terms of the compromise agreement except clause 6.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The compromise agreement was accepted as lawful and not opposed to public policy.
The compromise agreement was accepted as lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement except clause 6.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
St.Mary’s Convent (Age not specified years)
Ernakulam, Market Road, Ernakulam, Kovilvattom Desom, Pin – 682 035, Ernakulam Village, Kanayannoor taluk, Ernakulam District
Defendants
Saidhu Mohammed (73 years years)
Arakkaparambil house, Kovilavattom road, Kovilavattom Desom, Pin – 682 035, Ernakulam village, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam
Ramsabi (71 years years)
Arakkaparambil house, Kovilavattom road, Kovilavattom Desom, Pin – 682 035, Ernakulam village, Kanayannoor taluk, Ernakulam District
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement except clause 6.
Evidence:
Hence, Mediation Report except clause No.6 is accepted since the same is lawful and not opposed to public policy.