Case Summary
The case involves the State Bank of India as the plaintiff and Vinod Kumar.V.K as the defendant. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and there was no proof or representation from their side.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation. No Proof affidavit seen filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- State Bank of India
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vinod Kumar.V.K
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Lakshmi.L.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Vinod Kumar.V.K regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Vinod Kumar.V.K regarding dismissal of suit.