Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Commercial Suit No.93/2022

Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs SATHYAVATHI SUBRAMANI et al regarding loan recovery

Court
COURT OF COMMERCIAL/III ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Sri. Sidhik. K
Order Date
2025-03-20
Duration
approximately-8 years 8 months
Case Closed
Thu, 03/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, is seeking to recover an outstanding education loan amount from the defendants, Sathyavathi Subramani and Subramani A. The defendants defaulted on their loan repayments leading to this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendants are directed to pay an outstanding amount of Rs.19,78,061/- to the plaintiff with interest and costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to pay Rs.19,78,061/- to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendants are directed to pay an outstanding amount of Rs.19,78,061/- to the plaintiff with interest and costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established that the defendants failed to repay the loan despite multiple demands.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established that the defendants failed to repay the loan despite multiple demands.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged oral testimony of PW1 coupled with documents Exts. A1 to A7 very well shows that the defendants failed to repay the outstanding amount with interest to plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. Defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs.19,78,061/- (Nineteen lakh seventy eight thousand and sixty one only) to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
STATE BANK OF INDIA
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SATHYAVATHI SUBRAMANI
Party Age
51
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SUBRAMANI.A
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Application for loan dated 01/07/2016, Sanction letter dated 02/07/2016, Arrangement letter dated 02/07/2016, Agreement for education loan dated 02/07/2016, Lawyer notice dated 11/02/2021.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Sajeevan.M.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. E. Balakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to pay an outstanding amount of Rs.19,78,061/- to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Accordingly, the suit is liable to be decreed directing the defendants to pay the outstanding amount.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff will be entitled for interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till realization.
Evidence:
The plaintiff will be entitled for interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till realization of the decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff will be entitled for costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff will be entitled for costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Application for Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the application made by the first defendant for the education loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the sanction of the loan amount by the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Arrangement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms and conditions of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement for Education Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the agreement made between the defendants and the plaintiff for the education loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the notice sent by the plaintiff to the defendants regarding the default in repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Return letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the return letter received indicating non-claim by the second defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5(a)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides evidence of sending the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5(b)
Document Type: Certified copy of the ledger account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the transaction history of the loan account from 02/07/2016 to 15/01/2021.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Order in PIM
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document relates to the pre-institution mediation initiated by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Commercial Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs SATHYAVATHI SUBRAMANI et al regarding loan recovery
Case Code Year
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs SATHYAVATHI SUBRAMANI et al regarding loan recovery

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Case Filed
Fri, 07/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 03/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank, Thondayad Branch vs Jasmine.V et al regarding realisation of loan amount
COMMERCIAL/III ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Bank of Baroda vs M/s.Otto Motiv et al regarding realisation of money
II Addl. Commercial Court/Subordinate Judge, Kozhikode
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s.Eon Infrastructures and Developers Pvt. Ltd vs M/s.White Fort Constructions and Engineers Pvt. Ltd et al regarding realisation of money
Commercial Court/ II Addl. Subordinate Judge, Kozhikode
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Ranjith K.K regarding realisation of money.
Court of the Commercial Judge/II Addl. Sub Judge
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KPB Nidhi Ltd. vs Bipin P et al regarding realization of money
Commercial Court/ II Addl. Sub Judge
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won