Case Summary
The case involves a decree holder, State Bank of India, represented by Smt. Preethi, and a judgment debtor, Rahul.R. The petition was filed for execution of a decree under the Code of Civil Procedure.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decree transferred to Munsiff Court, Paravur for execution.
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the decree be transferred to Munsiff Court, Paravur for execution.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The decree holder provided sufficient grounds for the application to execute the decree.
The decree holder provided sufficient grounds for the application to execute the decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The decree holder provided sufficient grounds for the application to execute the decree.
The decree holder provided sufficient grounds for the application to execute the decree.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the decree holder had a valid claim for the execution.
Judgment Evidence:
The decree holder represented. Decree transferred to Munsiff Court, Paravur for execution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- State Bank of India
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rahul.R
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.T.K.Jayakumari
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Rahul.R regarding execution of decree.
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Rahul.R regarding execution of decree.