Case Summary
The case involves the State Bank of India as the plaintiff and Praseetha P.S as the defendant. The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of a balance court fee and no filed application.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected due to the absence of a balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- State Bank of India
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Praseetha P.S
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
No Balance Court Fee seen remitted, No application seen filed
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.G. Arun
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Swathy.L.M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Anitha.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Evidence:
the plaint is rejected under Order VII Rule 11(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Praseetha P.S regarding court fee rejection
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Praseetha P.S regarding court fee rejection