Case Summary
The case involves the State Bank of India as the plaintiff and M/s Makam Motors along with its proprietor, Pushparaj S.R as defendants. The plaint was rejected by the court due to the absence of a filing application.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the required court fees and file an application. This decision was pronounced in open court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaint was rejected under order VII Rule 11(c) CPC due to missing court fees.
The plaint was rejected under order VII Rule 11(c) CPC due to missing court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaint was rejected under order VII Rule 11(c) CPC due to missing court fees.
The plaint was rejected under order VII Rule 11(c) CPC due to missing court fees.
Supporting Evidence
No BCF seen remitted. No application seen filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under order VII Rule 11© CPC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- State Bank of India
- Relation
- represented by its Manager Ms. Viji, D/o. John
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Makam Motors
- Relation
- Represented by its Proprietor Pushparaj S.R
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pushparaj S.R
- Party Age
- 42
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Manvila T.M. Sreekumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint was rejected due to lack of BCF remittance and no application filed.
Evidence:
Hence, the plaint is rejected under order VII Rule 11© CPC.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025