Case Summary
The petitioner, State Bank of India, is seeking to transmit the decree to the concerned court. The respondents did not appear in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the transmission of the decree to the concerned court and closed the execution petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner successfully represented the decree holder and the court found merit in transmitting the decree.
The petitioner successfully represented the decree holder and the court found merit in transmitting the decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner successfully represented the decree holder and the court found merit in transmitting the decree.
The petitioner successfully represented the decree holder and the court found merit in transmitting the decree.
Supporting Evidence
The court passed the following order and pronounced it.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, transmit the decree to Court concerned. EP is closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- State Bank of India
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mrs.Amrutha S
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr.Sankaran KM
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Vinod Singh Cheriyan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Mrs.Amrutha S et al regarding transmission of decree.
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Mrs.Amrutha S et al regarding transmission of decree.