Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1043 of 2023

Case between State Bank of India vs Mr. Sabari Das A.A regarding realisation of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-02-17
Duration
approximately-5 years 3 months 12 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves State Bank of India seeking recovery of a loan amount from the defendant, Mr. Sabari Das A.A. The defendant defaulted on a loan sanctioned by the bank, leading to this suit for recovery.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff bank, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest and costs from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.51,961 together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established the claim based on unrebutted evidence and documentation of the loan agreement.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: A) The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.51,961 together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

State Bank of India (Age not specified years) Infopark, Lulu Cyber tower-1, Infopark campus, Kakkanad 682 042

Defendants

Mr. Sabari Das A.A (34 years) Ammikuzhimoolayil, Thengode P.O, Kakkanadu, Ernakulam District 682 030

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.51,961 with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
Hence the plaintiff bank is entitled to get a decree as prayed for.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff bank is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff bank is also entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document used to establish the loan application for the Kerala Flood Relief Loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Agreement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms of the loan agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This was a promise to repay the loan amount taken by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides the account details that show the outstanding amount due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Standing Instruction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document that specifies instructions for handling the loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice documents the statutory notice sent to the defendant regarding the repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 11/05/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases