Case Summary
The case involves the State Bank of India filing a suit against Saritha for the realization of money. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing and no representation was made.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent with no representation during the hearing.
The plaintiff was absent with no representation during the hearing.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent with no representation during the hearing.
The plaintiff was absent with no representation during the hearing.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent no representation. BCF not remitted. Plaint rejected.
Judgment Evidence:
Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 08th day of August, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- State Bank of India, PBB, Kadappakkada Branch
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saritha
- Party Age
- 50
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Deepa C. S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Recovery of money
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent no representation. BCF not remitted. Plaint rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India, PBB, Kadappakkada Branch vs Saritha regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India, PBB, Kadappakkada Branch vs Saritha regarding realisation of money