Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.891/2021

Case between State Bank of India et al vs Revathy. M. Vijayan regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-05
Duration
approximately-7 years 1 month
Case Closed
Thu, 06/05/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the State Bank of India suing Revathy. M. Vijayan for the recovery of a loan amount. The plaintiff claims that the defendant failed to repay the loan as per the agreement, leading to the bank filing this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of the unpaid loan amount along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,82,108/- along with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of the unpaid loan amount along with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence supplied by the plaintiff was not contradicted, confirming the defendant's liability.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence supplied by the plaintiff was not contradicted, confirming the defendant's liability.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A8 established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows; The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,82,108/- from the defendant and from her assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank of India
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vinitha Tharavath
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Revathy. M. Vijayan
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan agreement, Original sanction letter, Statement of account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.K. Hema
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of Rs.4,82,108/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,82,108/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Eighty Two Thousand One Hundred and Eight only) from the defendant and from her assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest at 12.5% per annum on the recovery amount from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12.5% per annum for Rs.4,82,108/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Eighty Two Thousand One Hundred and Eight only) from the date of suit till date of decree from the defendant and from her assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest at 6% per annum on the recovery amount from the date of decree till the date of realization.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.4,82,108/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Eighty Two Thousand One Hundred and Eight only) from date of decree till date of realization from the defendant and from her assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendant and from her assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Xpress Credit Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original loan application submitted by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sanction letter issued for the loan granted to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan Agreement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Loan agreement executed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Personal Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement regarding the terms of personal loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Promissory note signed by the defendant for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Demand promissory note delivery letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter regarding the delivery of the demand promissory note.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement showing loan disbursements and repayments.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Lawyer’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice served to the defendant regarding the loan default.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Revathy. M. Vijayan regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Revathy. M. Vijayan regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 04/17/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 06/05/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Dasan P.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between HDFC Bank Limited vs Baby P C et al regarding non-repayment of home loan
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Johnson N.D regarding loan repayment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Div 7 NHG 16 Jyothis et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shamna Basheer, Aysha Basheer regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won