Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 319/2024

Case between State Bank of India et al vs Anil Kumar A D regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-08-22
Duration
approximately-7 years 1 month 28 days
Case Closed
Fri, 08/22/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, filed a suit against the defendant, Anil Kumar A D, for recovery of loan amount due to non-payment. The defendant failed to adhere to the loan agreement terms leading to the initiation of recovery proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff a sum of Rs.3,11,345/- along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum until realization.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of Rs.3,11,345/- along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff a sum of Rs.3,11,345/- along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum until realization.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff has established its case with no evidence rebutted by the defendant.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff has established its case with no evidence rebutted by the defendant.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of plaint averments, affidavit of evidence and the documents produced, this court is satisfied that the plaintiff has established its case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of Rs.3,11,345/- (Rupees Three Lakh Eleven Thousand Three Hundred and Forty Five Only) along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realization of the sum.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank of India
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anil Kumar A D
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application form, Arrangement Letter, Loan cum Hypothecation Agreement, Office copy of the notice U/S 13 (2) of SARFAESI Act, Office copy of the notice under Rule 6(2) of the security interest (Enforcement) Rules, Copy of News paper Advertisement, Office Copy of the notice, True extract of the ledger of the loan Account Certified as per the Bankers Book of evidence Act.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manu J Varappally
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs. 3,11,345/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff the sum of Rs.3,11,345/- (Rupees Three Lakh Eleven Thousand Three Hundred and Forty Five Only) along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realization of the sum.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was submitted as part of the loan application process.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Arrangement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms of the loan sanctioned to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan cum hypothecation agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement relates to the loan taken by the defendant and details the obligations.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Office copy of the notice U/S 13 (2) of SARFAESI Act
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice demanded repayment from the defendant under the SARFAESI Act.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Office copy of the notice under Rule 6(2) of the security interest (Enforcement) Rules
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice informed the defendant about the auction proceedings for the secured asset.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of News paper Advertisement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This advertisement announced the e-auction of the vehicle.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Office copy of the notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice notified the defendant of the remaining balance payment after the auction.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Returned Postal Article
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document may relate to communication sent to the defendant that was not received.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: True extract of the ledger of the loan Account Certified as per the Bankers Book of evidence Act
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This extract provides the details of the loan account and outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Anil Kumar A D regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Anil Kumar A D regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam District, Kerala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Tue, 07/24/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 08/22/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Laila Nazar et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Bank of Baroda vs Chikku Nainan et al regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The South Indian Bank Ltd. vs Supriya Biju et al regarding realization of money for education loan.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between U C O Bank vs Restin K Mathew regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mathew Skariah et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won