Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1168/2022

Case between S.S.T.Lakshmanan vs S.S.T.Subramaninan et al regarding settlement of suit

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-08-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involved a suit filed by S.S.T.Lakshmanan against S.S.T.Subramaninan and others. The plaintiff decided not to proceed with the suit as the matter was settled out of court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed since the plaintiff settled the matter out of court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed since the plaintiff settled the matter out of court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff is no longer proceeding with the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff is no longer proceeding with the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff submitted that he is no longer proceeding with the suit as the subject matter of the suit has been settled out of court between the parties.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S.S.T.Lakshmanan
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S.S.T.Subramaninan
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S.Shantha
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.Vijaya Kumar
Relation
The President, The Film exhibitors United Organisation of Kerala
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Simon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Tresa Augustine
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Alias M Cherian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arun C.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.M.Raphy
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vivek Radha Krishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bristo S Pariyaram
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mohammed Siyad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between S.S.T.Lakshmanan vs S.S.T.Subramaninan et al regarding settlement of suit
Case Code Year
Case between S.S.T.Lakshmanan vs S.S.T.Subramaninan et al regarding settlement of suit

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won