Case Summary
S.Sivakumar filed a petition for an injunction against Ambika Devi.L regarding the peaceful possession and enjoyment of certain properties. The court granted an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's possession until a specified date.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction granted until 08/04/2025.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's property. This injunction remains effective until a future date specified by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court determined that the delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
The court determined that the delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court determined that the delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit, thus justifying the grant of an ad-interim injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit. Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendant/respondent from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of plaint A property and plaint B schedule way and from trespassing into plaint A schedule property until 08/4/2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- S.Sivakumar
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ambika Devi.L
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.N.S.Sujith Sibi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of plaint A property and plaint B schedule way.
Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendant/respondent from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of plaint A property and plaint B schedule way and from trespassing into plaint A schedule property until 08/4/2025.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025