Case Summary
The plaintiff, SriramaChandra Prabhu, sought legal redress against JHRC Ventures (p) Ltd. and its directors for unpaid salary amounting to Rs. 46,800/-. The plaintiff claimed he was owed this amount after resigning due to irregular salary payments and poor working conditions.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant No 1 shall pay Rs. 46,800/- with interest at 7% per annum from 29/08/2018.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the first defendant to pay Rs. 46,800/- as unpaid salary with interest. The court rejected the defendants' claim of discharge of the amount owed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants failed to prove discharge of the salary payment.
The defendants failed to prove discharge of the salary payment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendants failed to prove discharge of the salary payment.
The defendants failed to prove discharge of the salary payment.
Supporting Evidence
The defendants have failed to prove discharge of the amount claimed by the plaintiff as salary arrears.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant No 1 shall pay Rs. 46,800/- with interest at 7% per annum from 29/08/2018, till the date of decree and in case not paid, defendant shall also be liable for post decretal interest at 6% per annum till the date of realization.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- SriramaChandra Prabhu
- Party Age
- 23
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- JHRC Ventures (p) Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajika Devi R Pillai
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chanchal Sethuparvathy
- Party Age
- 27
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ranjith R
- Party Age
- 37
Plaintiffs Documents
A1 01.09.17 offer letter, A2 04.04.18 Letter issued by defendant, A3 04.10.18 Lawyer notice.
Defendants Documents
B1 28.09.18 Reply letter
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B.M.Ajith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dominic Johnson
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- A.T.Anil Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jose Paul Thottam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Syamon K.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Hazeena K.U
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Krishob K Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff seeks a decree for realization of Rs. 46,800/- as salary arrears.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is found entitled to recover Rs. 46,800/- with interest at 7% per annum from the 1st defendant from 29/08/2018, till the date of decree.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Defendant No. 1 shall also pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Offer letter
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The offer letter dated 01.09.17 outlines the terms of employment of the plaintiff with the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Letter from Defendant
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter issued by the defendant is relevant to the terms of employment or notice to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
A notice issued to demand payment of the outstanding salary, relevant to the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Unserved Cover
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This unserved cover is associated with the lawyer's notice issued by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Unserved Cover
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This unserved cover is another piece of evidence related to the notices sent by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Unserved Cover
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is yet another unserved cover linked to the correspondences made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Reply letter
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
This letter serves as a response to the claims made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between SriramaChandra Prabhu vs JHRC Ventures (p) Ltd. et al regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between SriramaChandra Prabhu vs JHRC Ventures (p) Ltd. et al regarding realization of money.