Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.305/2020

Case between Sri. Tony.J.Pulikkal vs Sri. A.K. Nahas regarding civil suit

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-02-14
Duration
approximately-3 years 21 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Sri. Tony.J.Pulikkal, filed a suit against the defendant, Sri. A.K. Nahas. The case was settled through mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the parties had settled their dispute through a mediation agreement. The suit was decreed in terms of the mediation agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of entire court fee paid
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the parties had settled their dispute through a mediation agreement. The suit was decreed in terms of the mediation agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied that the terms of mediation agreement are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement. Mediation agreement shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sri. Tony.J.Pulikkal
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. A.K. Nahas
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Cherian Karippaparambil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.U.Ziyad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Susan Ziyad
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled for refund of entire court fee paid.
Evidence:
Plaintiff entitled for refund of entire court fee paid.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court refers to the mediation agreement which was filed and stated to be lawful.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sri. Tony.J.Pulikkal vs Sri. A.K. Nahas regarding civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sri. Tony.J.Pulikkal vs Sri. A.K. Nahas regarding civil suit

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 02/14/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won