Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 383/2015

Case between Sri. K.K Rajappan vs Sri. Jayan et al regarding execution petition

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-07-29
Duration
approximately-1 year 1 month
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Sri. K.K Rajappan as the decree holder and several judgment debtors including Sri. Jayan, Aji P.R, Narayanan, and Kishore K.K. The petition concerns the execution of a decree, which has been fulfilled.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court closed the execution petition after noting that the decree had been fully satisfied as of June 22, 2023, and there was nothing more to be done in this regard.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court closed the execution petition after noting that the decree had been fully satisfied as of June 22, 2023, and there was nothing more to be done in this regard.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court noted that the decree had been executed fully.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court noted that the decree had been executed fully.
Supporting Evidence
The court on the same day passed the following: Decree Holder represented. Judgment Debtor no representation. Delivery is already effected on 22.06.2023.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence E.P closed recording full satisfaction. EA 496/23 also closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sri. K.K Rajappan
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. Jayan
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. Aji P.R
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. Narayanan
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. Kishore K.K
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Varghese A Chacko
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dennis Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Naveen T.U
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jenny Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Full satisfaction of the decree recorded and the execution petition closed.
Evidence:
The counsel for Decree Holder has submitted full satisfaction. Hence E.P closed recording full satisfaction.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sri. K.K Rajappan vs Sri. Jayan et al regarding execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between Sri. K.K Rajappan vs Sri. Jayan et al regarding execution petition

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 01/01/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Mahendra Kumar. C vs Suresh. V. Varghese regarding E.P No. 199/2023
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Cornation Curries Private Limited vs Happy Varghese et al regarding E.P No. 31/2020
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Shamughapuram Co-operative Bank Limited vs Sumathy Vijayan regarding execution petition
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Manager, DTDC Express Limited et al regarding decree satisfaction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won