Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 33/2023

Case between Sreenivasan et al vs Neelakandan Namboodiri et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
approximately-10 years 2 months
Case Code No.
33
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Sreenivasan and his wife Ajithakumari, are involved in a suit regarding ownership rights over certain properties in Njeezhoor Village. The first defendant, Neelakandan Namboodiri, is accused of encroaching on the plaintiffs' land and the plaintiffs seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against this.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court declared the settlement deeds executed by the first defendant as null and void and granted a permanent injunction preventing the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' ownership of the properties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiffs are entitled for a declaration that settlement deed No.348/2020 and No.416/2020 of SRO, Kaduthuruthi and sale deed No. 1101/2020 are null and void. Defendants are restrained from alienating properties.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court declared the settlement deeds executed by the first defendant as null and void and granted a permanent injunction preventing the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' ownership of the properties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiffs proved their ownership and possession rights through valid documents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiffs proved their ownership and possession rights through valid documents.
Supporting Evidence
From the unchallenged evidence, it can be seen that plaintiff was entitled to get a decree of declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit was decreed as follows: Plaintiffs are entitled for a declaration that settlement deed No.348/2020 of SRO, Kaduthuruthi and the settlement deed No.416/2020 of SRO, Kaduthuruthi as null and void.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreenivasan
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajithakumari
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Neelakandan Namboodiri
Party Age
79
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saji Namboodiri
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thankamma Antharjanam
Party Age
78
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joseph Chandy
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Settlement deed No.2044/2000, Correction deed No.2281/2010, Original tax receipt No.3247279.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.S.Renjith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants were restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from alienating item No.1 and 2 property to anyone.
Evidence:
Defendants and men under them or their agents were restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from alienating item No.1 and 2 property to anyone, subject it to any encumbrance, trespassing into it, causing damage to the residential building situated therein, doing any acts of violence or corrupt practices against the plaintiffs right of ownership over the plaint schedule properties.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs are entitled for a declaration that settlement deed No.348/2020 and the settlement deed No.416/2020 and sale deed No.1101/2020 as null and void.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs are entitled for a declaration that settlement deed No.348/2020 of SRO, Kaduthuruthi and the settlement deed No.416/2020 of SRO, Kaduthuruthi and sale deed No. 1101/2020 of SRO, Kaduthuruuthi as null and void.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of settlement deed No.2044/2000 of Kaduthuruthy SRO which proves the ownership of the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Correction Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of correction deed No.2281/2010 which corrects the title deed details.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original tax receipt No.3247279 issued from Njeezhoor Village office showing that the plaintiff was paying tax on the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of settlement deed No.348/2020 of Kaduthuruthy SRO referenced in context of ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of settlement deed No.416/2020 of Kaduthuruthy SRO referenced in context of ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of sale deed No.1101/2020 of Kaduthuruthy SRO referenced in context of ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of judgment in OS.29/2015 relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Decree
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of decree in OS.29/2015 relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of judgment in OS.198/2018 relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Decree
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of decree in OS.198/2018 relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of settlement deed No.2045/2000 of Kaduthuruthy SRO which proves the ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original tax receipt No.3247278 issued from Njeezhoor Village office showing that the plaintiff was paying tax on the property.
Reference:
Ext.A12

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Fraudulent documents
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nandini et al vs Saalli regarding partition and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nandini et al vs Saalli regarding partition and injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Partial
Case between Subichan P.K. vs Joseph P.J. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thankappan vs Jineesh.P.U regarding fixation of boundary.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thressiamma Kunjumon et al vs Pennamma Devasia et al regarding declaration and partition
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won