Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 576/2023

Case between Sreelekha S Nair vs Lakshmikutty et al regarding default dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sreelekha S Nair filed a suit against Lakshmikutty and the State Bank of India. The plaintiff was continuously absent, leading to the suit being dismissed for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff without representation. The court required the plaintiff to indicate intent to proceed, which was not fulfilled.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear in court despite being notified to do so.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sreelekha S Nair (43 years years) LIG No. 718, Panampilly Nagar, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam – 682 036

Defendants

Lakshmikutty (62 years years) 22 DRRA – 6, Ponnuruni, Chalikkavattom, Deepam Junction, Rice Researchroad, Vytilla P.O, Elamkulam village, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam – 682 019 State Bank of India (Age not specified years) Valanjambalam branch, Ernakulam – 682 016

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
The suit was posted specifically for this date for the plaintiff to appear and submit whether the plaintiff is intending to proceed with the suit. Still, the plaintiff is absent. Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases