Case Summary
Sreelatha Raveendran filed a restoration petition against Canara Bank and Sreelakshmi R. The petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition as not pressed due to the petitioner's counsel filing and not pressing the memo.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was dismissed because it was not pressed.
The petition was dismissed because it was not pressed.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was dismissed because it was not pressed.
The petition was dismissed because it was not pressed.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment details indicate the petition was dismissed due to lack of pressing.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sreelatha Raveendran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreelakshmi R
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN.
Case Code Year
2025