Case Summary
Sreekumar T S filed a petition for a temporary injunction against Mubeena M M. The court granted the injunction to prevent the respondent from evicting the petitioner and allowing him to exhibit an advertisement board.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction against evicting the petitioner and preventing advertisement.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted the temporary injunction requested by the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established a prima facie case for an injunction.
The petitioner established a prima facie case for an injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a prima facie case and if order of temporary injunction is not granted, irreparable injury is likely to be caused to the petitioner.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondents from peaceful enjoyment of the plaint schedule property and from forcefully evicting the petitioner from the same without due process of law.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sreekumar T S
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mubeena M M
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Seby J Pullely
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Akshay Babu K S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abhiram P P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Thomas C J
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Kiran Murali
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Josnu C F
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Temporary Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Order of interim injunction restraining respondents from peaceful enjoyment of the plaint schedule property and from forcefully evicting the petitioner.
Evidence:
Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondents from peaceful enjoyment of the plaint schedule property and from forcefully evicting the petitioner from the same without due process of law and from restraining respondents from preventing petitioner to exhibit advertisement board in the plaint schedule property until further orders.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2024