Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 252/2024

Case between Sreedevi vs Ambily Roshan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2025-02-21
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Sreedevi, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against her cousin and uncle who are allegedly threatening her right to possess her property. The defendants coerced a relative into transferring part of the property and are accused of trespassing and making threats.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting her a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from trespassing her property and ordering them to pay the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing and committing any waste or damages in the plaint schedule property; costs of the suit to plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established her case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed on the following terms. Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing and committing any waste or any damages in the plaint schedule property. Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sreedevi (31 years years) Namgyarathuparambil House, Nettoor, Now residing at Kausthubham, Chottanikkara P O, Kanayanur Taluk, Ernakulam- 682312

Defendants

Ambily Roshan (30 years years) Ambattu House, Chottanikara P O, Ernakulam- 682312 Roshan A K (56 years years) Ambattu House, Eroor South P O, Nadama, Kanayannur, Ernakulam- 682306

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing and committing any waste or any damages in the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing and committing any waste or any damages in the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiff.
Evidence:
Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that the plaintiff purchased the plaint schedule property from Robert.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the plaintiff's possession of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides evidence of the plaintiff's financial responsibilities for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Location Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the location and boundaries of the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document of a prior complaint made by the 1st defendant against the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases