Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.456/2023

Case between Sreedevi. S vs Rema regarding boundary, permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction

Court
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Judge
Smt. Karthika.A.R
Order Date
2025-02-19
Duration
approximately-1 year 8 months
Case Closed
Wed, 02/19/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Sreedevi. S, is seeking relief against the defendant, Rema, for obstructing the only pathway providing access to the plaintiff's property. The case involves a dispute over property boundaries and the encroachment of a cattle shed by the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court partly decreed the suit, restraining the defendant from obstructing the use of the plaint C schedule pathway and allowing the plaintiff to recover costs from the defendant. The court found in favor of the plaintiff regarding the use of the pathway.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is restrained from obstructing the use of the plaint C schedule pathway and the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint A schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court partly decreed the suit, restraining the defendant from obstructing the use of the plaint C schedule pathway and allowing the plaintiff to recover costs from the defendant. The court found in favor of the plaintiff regarding the use of the pathway.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff was able to establish a valid claim regarding the use of the pathway and demonstrated that the defendant had obstructed this usage.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff was able to establish a valid claim regarding the use of the pathway and demonstrated that the defendant had obstructed this usage.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is entitled to get a decree to use the C schedule pathway as it is reported by the commissioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is partly decreed with costs as follows: 1. It is ordered and directed that the defendant is restrained from obstructing the use of the plaint C schedule pathway and obstructing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint A schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreedevi. S
Party Age
76
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rema
Party Age
65
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Sale deed No 1630/1981, Copy of Tax receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Vettoor S. Prakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought to restrain the defendant from obstructing the use of the plaint C schedule pathway.
Evidence:
It is ordered and directed that the defendant is restrained from obstructing the use of the plaint C schedule pathway and obstructing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint A schedule property.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is allowed to realize the cost of the suit from the defendant and her assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of the plaintiff's title and possession of the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document corroborates the plaintiff's claim regarding the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The report provides findings relevant to the encroachment and use of the plaint C schedule pathway.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sreedevi. S vs Rema regarding boundary, permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sreedevi. S vs Rema regarding boundary, permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 06/22/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 02/19/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won