O.S. No.334/2021

Case between S.Rani vs Suseela et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court

IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF

Judge

Sri.Mithun Gopi.G.S.

Order Date

2025-01-10

Duration

Case Closed

Fri, 01/10/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

S.Rani filed a suit against Suseela and Divakaran. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the suit being dismissed for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The court dismissed the suit because the plaintiff was absent and not represented. The defendants were present during the hearing.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit because the plaintiff was absent and not represented. The defendants were present during the hearing.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: S.Rani
Party Age: 56
Relation: W/o.Suresh Babu

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Suseela
Party Age: 57
Relation: W/o.Divakaran

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Divakaran
Party Age: 62

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.Arun S.R
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.G.S.Rajeev Chempakassery
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.G.S.Sanalkumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The suit is dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.

Evidence: