Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1245/2024

Case between Southern Phosphate & Mineral vs AKT Agencies et al regarding a suit decreed in terms of compromise.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-10-08
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Southern Phosphate & Mineral filed a suit against AKT Agencies and A.K Thomas. The court heard the case and accepted the compromise terms.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the compromise petition and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise. The plaintiff is also entitled to a refund of court fee as per law.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee as per law.
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The compromise terms were found lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence IA No. 01/2025 is allowed. Compromise terms accepted. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Southern Phosphate & Mineral (Age not specified years) 39/986-A2, 1st Floor, Apoorva Apartments, Subhash Chandra Bose Road, Vyttila P.O, Cochin - 682019

Defendants

AKT Agencies (Age not specified years) Karattapadi, Thekkumthara Post, Wayanad-673122 Mr. A.K Thomas (58 years years) Arakka parambil House Pinangod P.O, Vengapally, Wayanadu, PIN: 673 122

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compromise terms accepted and suit decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Hence IA No. 01/2025 is allowed. Compromise terms accepted. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise. Compromise terms in IA No.01/2025 shall form part of decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement to refund of court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fee as per law.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases