Case Summary
The South Indian Bank filed a suit against Miha Enterprises and its partners. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was not represented in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence in court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not represented in court.
The plaintiff was not represented in court.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was not represented in court.
The plaintiff was not represented in court.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was not represented in court.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- The South Indian Bank
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Miha Enterprises
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Harikumar K.A
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mrs. Emi Binu
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.J.P. Pious
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Bino I Tom
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between The South Indian Bank vs Miha Enterprises et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between The South Indian Bank vs Miha Enterprises et al regarding dismissal of suit.