Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.292/2022

Case between South Indian Bank vs Cadenza Creations regarding balance court fee

Court
THE MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-07-23
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The South Indian Bank filed a suit against Cadenza Creations for balance court fee issues. The plaintiff was absent during the court hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation, and balance court fee not being remitted.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent, leading to the rejection of the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit rejected Under order 7, Rule 11.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

South Indian Bank (Age not specified years) Perumbavoor Branch, Dream Tower Thombra, A M Road, Opp. Govt. Hospital, Perumbavoor

Defendants

Cadenza Creations (42 years) PMC VII/618-A7, Lotus Tower, Perumbavoor, now residing at Thuruthiparambil House, Near Boys HSS, Perumbavoor – 683542

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected Under order 7, Rule 11.
Evidence:
Suit rejected Under order 7, Rule 11.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases