Case Summary
The plaintiffs filed a petition seeking relief against the defendants due to non-repayment of invested amounts in gold business schemes.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permission to sue as forma pauperis
Case Type
Civil Suit - Financial Dispute
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition and granted the relief claimed by the petitioners.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiffs did not possess sufficient means to pay the court fee and were entitled to the relief claimed.
The court found that the plaintiffs did not possess sufficient means to pay the court fee and were entitled to the relief claimed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the plaintiffs did not possess sufficient means to pay the court fee and were entitled to the relief claimed.
The court found that the plaintiffs did not possess sufficient means to pay the court fee and were entitled to the relief claimed.
Supporting Evidence
According to the PW1 the petitioners have no properties except the movable properties mentioned in the petition. There is nothing to show that the petitioner has disposed of any property...
Judgment Evidence:
The petition is allowed. The petition shall be numbered as plaint.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Soudath V.
- Party Age
- 23
- Relation
- Wife of
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Basheer
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Accomplish Marketing Company (Pvt) Ltd.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thattarambath Prasad
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gopalakrishnan
- Party Age
- 55
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pookkayil Ahammed
- Party Age
- 55
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kelippattu Alikkutty
- Party Age
- 70
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mankuthil Jafar Sidheekh
Plaintiffs Documents
No further details provided
Defendants Documents
No further details provided
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.C.Nandakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Soumya.K.P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.C.M.Venugopalan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permission to sue as forma pauperis
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petitioner allowed to file suit as an indigent person
Evidence:
The petition is allowed. The petition shall be numbered as plaint.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Financial Dispute
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Financial dispute
Case Code
Case between Soudath V. et al vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding financial dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Soudath V. et al vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding financial dispute