Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No. 1492 OF 2016

Case between Soudamini et al vs Vattakandi Karunakaran's Children et al regarding partition of property

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SMT. VINCY.T.V., B.A., LL.B., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2017-11-30
Duration
5 years 5 days
Case Closed
Thu, 11/30/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners filed for final decree for partition following a preliminary decree. Commissioner allocated shares equitably among the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The final decree for partition was passed, allocating shares as per the Commissioner's report.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Final decree for partition
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The final decree for partition was passed, allocating shares as per the Commissioner's report.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
The Advocate Commissioner has effected division of the decree schedule property in an equitable manner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition allowed and final decree for partition is passed as follows...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Soudamini
Party Age
49
Relation
Wife of Vattakandi Velayudhan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Subeesh
Party Age
26
Relation
Son of Vattakandi Velayudhan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vattakandi Balan
Party Age
47
Relation
Son of Karunakaran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vattakandi Karunakaran's Children
Plaintiffs Documents
Preliminary decree dated 4.12.2014, Document No. 1593/ 2009 of SRO Kalpakancheri
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Final decree for partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Allocation of shares as per Commissioner's report
Evidence:
The Commissioner has allocated shares equitably among the parties.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Preliminary decree
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Basis for final decree for partition
Reference:
Dated 4.12.2014
Document Type: Official transfer document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledges transfer of shares to the third plaintiff
Reference:
Document No. 1593/ 2009 of SRO Kalpakancheri

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Partition of property
Case Code
Case between Soudamini et al vs Vattakandi Karunakaran's Children et al regarding partition of property
Case Code Year
Case between Soudamini et al vs Vattakandi Karunakaran's Children et al regarding partition of property

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2012 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 11/30/2017 - 12:00
From
Wed, 11/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Thu, 11/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Saseendran vs Lakshmi-D1 regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Unknown
Case between Kadiyumma vs Pathummakutty et al. regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Rafeeq vs Fathimakkutty Umma et al regarding partition of property
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Valavath Hamza et al vs Valavath Mammikkutty et al regarding property partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff and defendant
Case between Valavath Hamza et al vs Valavath Mammikkutty et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won