Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1118/2023

Case between Sony Thomas vs Thressiamma Joseph regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-10-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Sony Thomas, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Thressiamma Joseph, to prevent eviction from a commercial property. The plaintiff claims a statutory tenant status and alleges threats and unlawful eviction attempts by the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant from evicting the plaintiff except through due process of law.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against eviction.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant from evicting the plaintiff except through due process of law.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established valid tenancy and presented unchallenged evidence supporting his claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established valid tenancy and presented unchallenged evidence supporting his claim.
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that plaintiff has entered the plaint schedule property and continues in plaint schedule property validly as a tenant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed on the following terms. 1) Defendant is restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from forcibly evicting plaintiff from the suit schedule property otherwise than in due process of law.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sony Thomas
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thressiamma Joseph
Party Age
75
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Photocopy of rent agreement dated 19.01.2023, Original receipts of rent payments.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Varghese C Kuriakose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amritha J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Haritha Raju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from forcibly evicting the plaintiff from the suit schedule property.
Evidence:
Defendant is restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from forcibly evicting plaintiff from the suit schedule property otherwise than in due process of law.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiff.
Evidence:
Defendant is directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Photocopy of rent agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the agreement under which the plaintiff is claiming tenancy.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original of receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These receipts indicate regular rent payments made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Exts.A2 to A6, A8, A11
Document Type: Copy of Google pay receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These receipts indicate payments made through Google Pay for rent and other charges.
Reference:
Ext.A7, A9, A10
Document Type: Bank Statement indicating Google pay
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows a bank transaction that supports the plaintiff's claims about payments.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Copy of Google pay receipt indicating payment of electricity charges
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These receipts provide evidence of the plaintiff's payments for electricity charges.
Reference:
Ext.A13 to A18
Document Type: Photo Copy of Google pay receipt indicating water charges
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These receipts provide evidence of the plaintiff's payments for water charges.
Reference:
Ext.A19, A20

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sony Thomas vs Thressiamma Joseph regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Sony Thomas vs Thressiamma Joseph regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won