Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 101/2024

Case between Sonia Sibichen vs Uma Devi K.S et al regarding property dispute

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-06-13
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sonia Sibichen, the plaintiff, claims ownership and exclusive access to certain properties against the defendants, who are her relatives. The defendants allegedly attempted to trespass and obstruct the plaintiff's use of a pathway leading to the properties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for an interim prohibitory injunction in favor of the plaintiff to prevent the defendants from trespassing and causing obstruction to the plaintiff's property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing and causing obstruction.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner has made out a prima facie case for ownership and peaceful possession.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sonia Sibichen (62 years years) Kudakachira house, Hill palace, Thiruvankulam village, Kanayannoor taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 305

Defendants

Uma Devi K.S (58 years years) Kunnapillil house, Thiruvankulam village, Ernakulam District, Kanayannoor taluk, Pin – 682 305 Usha Devi K.S (56 years years) Kunnapillil house, Thiruvankulam village, Ernakulam District, Kanayannoor taluk, Pin – 682 305

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought an interim prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from trespassing into her property and the adjacent pathway.
Evidence:
Hence, the point is found in favour of the petitioner, the petition is allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document establishes the plaintiff's ownership of the property in dispute.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The partition deed references the boundaries relevant to the property claimed by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Basic Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt serves as evidence of the plaintiff's payment of property tax and acknowledgment of ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The report provides an assessment of the pathways and property boundaries in the dispute.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases