Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 101/2024

Case between Sonia Sibichen vs Uma Devi K.S et al regarding property dispute

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-06-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sonia Sibichen, the plaintiff, claims ownership and exclusive access to certain properties against the defendants, who are her relatives. The defendants allegedly attempted to trespass and obstruct the plaintiff's use of a pathway leading to the properties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for an interim prohibitory injunction in favor of the plaintiff to prevent the defendants from trespassing and causing obstruction to the plaintiff's property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing and causing obstruction.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for an interim prohibitory injunction in favor of the plaintiff to prevent the defendants from trespassing and causing obstruction to the plaintiff's property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner has made out a prima facie case for ownership and peaceful possession.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner has made out a prima facie case. The balance of convenience in granting the relief of the equitable relief of injunction is also in favour of the petitioners.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sonia Sibichen
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o late Sibichen
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Uma Devi K.S
Party Age
58
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Usha Devi K.S
Party Age
56
Plaintiffs Documents
Photocopy of Sale deed no. 633/18 of SRO Tripunithura, Photocopy of the Partition deed no. 2735/81 of SRO Tripunithura, True copy of the Basic tax receipt bearing Tandapper no. 6713 issued by Thiruvankulam village office
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.B.Thankappan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.T.Harikumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.Gopala Krishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saiben Nikkish P.N
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.Devanand
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anjali G Krishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Soumya Lakshmi S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Athulya Pushpan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arjun S Menon
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.G.Devipriya
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.Nikhil Rajeev
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ushakumari M.K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adithya P Chandran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought an interim prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from trespassing into her property and the adjacent pathway.
Evidence:
Hence, the point is found in favour of the petitioner, the petition is allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document establishes the plaintiff's ownership of the property in dispute.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The partition deed references the boundaries relevant to the property claimed by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Basic Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt serves as evidence of the plaintiff's payment of property tax and acknowledgment of ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The report provides an assessment of the pathways and property boundaries in the dispute.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sonia Sibichen vs Uma Devi K.S et al regarding property dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Sonia Sibichen vs Uma Devi K.S et al regarding property dispute

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won