Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 993/2012

Case between Somasundaran Nair vs Mohanakumari, Neelakanda Pillai regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-08-14
Duration
approximately-12 years 21 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Somasundaran Nair is the plaintiff who seeks a declaration of right over a property and a permanent injunction against the defendants Mohanakumari and Neelakanda Pillai who prevented him from using a pathway. The case revolves around property rights and easements.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff's right of easement was recognized, allowing him to use the pathways designated as B and C. The court prohibited the defendants from obstructing the plaintiff's access.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Declaration of right of easement for use of pathways B and C, and permanent injunction against obstruction.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully demonstrated his right of easement by implied grant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed in part as follows, Plaintiff is hereby declared to be entitled to use plaint B and C schedule properties depicted as B and B1 in Ext C3(a) sketch as a right of easement by implied grant for ingress and egress towards plaint A schedule property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Somasundaran Nair (56 years years) Revathi house, Udayamperoor Desom, Manakunnam village, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Mohanakumari (54 years years) Chakala Madam-Thuruthiyil house, Udayamperoor Desom, Manakunnam village, Ernakulam District Neelakanda Pillai (60 years years) Chakala Madam-Thuruthiyil house, Udayamperoor Desom, Manakunnam village, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is hereby declared to be entitled to use plaint B and C schedule properties as a right of easement by implied grant.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is found to be having a right of easement by implied grant for use as a passage over the portions shown as B1 and B in Ext C3(a) sketch
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are restrained from obstructing the plaintiff and his agents from using the plaint B and C schedule properties.
Evidence:
Defendants, their men, agents and anybody claiming under them are hereby restrained from obstructing the plaintiff

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Sale deed by which the plaintiff purchased the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Exchange Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Exchange deed affecting the title ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement subject to objection.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement subject to objection.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Judgment in FAO(RO) no. 36/18 of the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Land Tax receipt issued by Manakunnam village.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Survey Sketch
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
True copy of the Survey sketch of Field no. 355 and 359 issued by Revenue Authority.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Property tax paid receipt issued by Manakunnam village office.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Exchange Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of the Exchange Deed affecting the title ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission Report filed by Adv. Mini K.A in IA 7633/12.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Rough sketch related to the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission Report filed by Mini K.A in IA 3473/14.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch prepared by Taluk Surveyor.
Reference:
Ext.C2(a)
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission Report filed by Adv.Riyan Augustine Shaji in IA 2/23.
Reference:
Ext.C3
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Sketch prepared by Private Surveyor.
Reference:
Ext.C3(a)

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
Case Filed
Wed, 12/05/2012 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases