Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
SUCC.(O.P).02/2024

Case between Sobhanakumari et al vs Praveena et al regarding Succession Petition

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-08-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves petitioners Sobhanakumari and Sreelakshmi Anoosh who are seeking a succession order. The respondents are Praveena and Aswanth Anoosh, the heirs of the deceased Anooshkumar P.C.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The mediation report was accepted and the petition was allowed in accordance with the compromise agreement reached between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Succession Petition
Final Judgment
No
The mediation report was accepted and the petition was allowed in accordance with the compromise agreement reached between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Matter settled in mediation. Mediation report filed along with compromise agreement. Terms of agreement are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition allowed in terms of mediation agreement. Terms of agreement shall form part of the Order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sobhanakumari
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o Late Chakrapani
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sreelakshmi Anoosh
Party Age
20
Relation
D/o Anooshkumar P.C (Late)
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Praveena
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o Late Anooshkumar P.C
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aswanth Anoosh
Party Age
11
Relation
S/o Late Anooshkumar P.C
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jayakrishnan R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joji Alex
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.S.Renjith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition allowed in terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Hence petition allowed in terms of mediation agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Succession Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sobhanakumari et al vs Praveena et al regarding Succession Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Sobhanakumari et al vs Praveena et al regarding Succession Petition

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Merykutty vs James et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Alok Kumar Saboo et al vs Rajeev Saboo et al regarding issuance of succession certificate
Court of the Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Succession Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Prema. N. A vs Padma Gopalakrishnapilla regarding succession certificate
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Succession Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Vincentian Ashram vs HDFC Bank Limited et al regarding issuance of Succession Certificate
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM
Succession Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Jayakumari vs State Bank of India regarding issuance of Succession Certificate
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Succession Petition Plaintiff Won