Case Summary
The plaintiffs are Smt.V.M.Mary and Smt.Honey Jones. The case was about a suit that was brought to court which was dismissed for default due to absence of both parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default due to the absence of both the plaintiff and the defendant.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Smt.V.M.Mary
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Smt.Honey Jones
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vigil Joseph
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anil S Raj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rajani K.N
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.Radhika Rajasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anila Peter
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sudheesh S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shaji Thankappan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to absence of both parties.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Smt.V.M.Mary vs Vigil Joseph regarding default dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Smt.V.M.Mary vs Vigil Joseph regarding default dismissal