Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1359/2017

Case between Smt. Sheela Rajendran vs Sri. Sundaran et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-05
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Smt. Sheela Rajendran, a widow, is suing local musclemen and her sister-in-laws for trespassing and harassment concerning her inherited property. She seeks a permanent injunction to prevent them from interfering with her rental business and personal peace.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, preventing them from trespassing and interfering with the plaintiff's rights over the property. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendants and their men and agents from trespassing into any portion of the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiff had the legal right over the property based on the evidence presented, including the original release deed and other supporting documents.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows. A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendants and their men and agents from trespassing into any portion of the plaint schedule property and from doing any acts detrimental to the plaintiff and her minor children's right, title, interest and possession and peaceful enjoyment over the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Smt. Sheela Rajendran (43 years years) Thekkinethnirappu, Vadakkeveettil Chottanikkara Desam, Kanyannoor Village Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin-682 312

Defendants

Sri. Sundaran (48 years years) Thekkinethnirappu Mangattu Puthanpurayil, Chottanikkara. P.O, Ernakulam District-682 312 Sathishkumar.T.N. (52 years years) Thekkinethnirappu Thekkeveedu, Chottanikkara. P.O, Ernakulam District - 682 312 Smt. Sunandakumari @ Sunanda Janardhanan (52 years years) Kunnatholikkal House, Edanadu P.O, Pala Kottayam District, Pin - 686 574 Smt. Prasanna Dileep (44 years years) Cherukkadu House Ayyampillykavu Junction, Eroor North P.O Tripunithura, Ernakulam District - 682 306 Smt. Nirmala @ Nirmala Krishnankutty (42 years years) Plangudiyil House Mekkadambu P.O, Mekkadambu Junction Muvattupuzha, Ernakulam District - 682316

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the property.
Evidence:
A decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is passed restraining the defendants and their men and agents from trespassing into any portion of the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement of the plaintiff to recover costs from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Release deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original release deed establishing property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt supporting plaintiff's claims regarding property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Possession certificate validating plaintiff's right to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Partition deed further supporting the plaintiff's claim over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Unrebutted oral testimony of the plaintiff establishing her case.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases