Case Summary
SML Finance Limited filed a suit against Shajahan and Ali seeking money. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Money Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not present.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff not present. Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- SML Finance Limited
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shajahan
- Relation
- S/o. Alavi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ali
- Relation
- S/o. Muhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Beena, K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Gopikadavath
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Unknown
Evidence:
Plaintiff not present. Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Money Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between SML Finance Limited vs Shajahan et al regarding money suit
Case Code Year
Case between SML Finance Limited vs Shajahan et al regarding money suit