Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 91/2023

Case between Smitha vs Nadakkavu Bhagavathi Kshetra Committee et al regarding court fee payment

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-03-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Smitha filed a suit against Nadakkavu Bhagavathi Kshetra Committee and others regarding the non-payment of court fees. The plaintiff was absent and unrepresented during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to pay the balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to pay the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint is rejected for non payment of Balance Court Fee.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Smitha
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nadakkavu Bhagavathi Kshetra Committee
Relation
represented by its Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kizhakkubhagam NSS Karayogam no. 2805
Relation
represented by Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Baiju A.B
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Stibin Stephen
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
National Insurance Company Ltd
Relation
represented by its Divisional Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.Dilip
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bibin Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sandeep S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rakesh R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.E.Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff's suit was rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected for non payment of Balance Court Fee.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Smitha vs Nadakkavu Bhagavathi Kshetra Committee et al regarding court fee payment
Case Code Year
Case between Smitha vs Nadakkavu Bhagavathi Kshetra Committee et al regarding court fee payment

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won