Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 34/2020

Case between Smitha N.T. vs Repco home finance limited et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-08-13
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 08/13/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Smitha N.T. is the plaintiff in this case against Repco home finance limited and others. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff not being present for the hearing. Costs were awarded to the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff not being present for the hearing. Costs were awarded to the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and present evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear and present evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff no representation. D1 and D2 represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed with costs to D1 and D2.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Smitha N.T.
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Repco home finance limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Authorised officer, Assistant General Manager Recovery department, Repco home finance limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajith
Relation
Ex parte
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sam Isaac Pothiyil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vishnu Das
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sruthi Das
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Paulochan Antony P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sunilkumar S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed with costs to D1 and D2.
Evidence:
Plaintiff no representation. D1 and D2 represented. D3 exparte. Taken up at roll call and there after. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Dismissed with costs to D1 and D2.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Smitha N.T. vs Repco home finance limited et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Smitha N.T. vs Repco home finance limited et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 08/13/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won