Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 863/2020

Case between Sivan K.P vs Suran regarding dismissal for default.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-01-20
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sivan K.P is the plaintiff, but he was absent for several hearings despite court orders to appear. The defendant, Suran, was represented during the proceedings. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff's suit was dismissed for default due to continuous absence and lack of representation in court despite specific directions to appear.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation led to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sivan K.P (58 years years) Thoovanattu house, Perumpilly P.O, Kanayannoor taluk, Mulamthuruthy village, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 314

Defendants

Suran (52 years years) Kaduvalakkal house, Perumpilly P.O, Kanayannoor taluk, Mulamthuruthy village, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 314

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases