Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 863/2020

Case between Sivan K.P vs Suran regarding dismissal for default.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-01-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sivan K.P is the plaintiff, but he was absent for several hearings despite court orders to appear. The defendant, Suran, was represented during the proceedings. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff's suit was dismissed for default due to continuous absence and lack of representation in court despite specific directions to appear.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff's suit was dismissed for default due to continuous absence and lack of representation in court despite specific directions to appear.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation led to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
No representation for the plaintiff continuously for their past several posting dates.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sivan K.P
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suran
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arun George D
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jipson John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B.Rahul Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jomon P Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sivan K.P vs Suran regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Sivan K.P vs Suran regarding dismissal for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won