Case Summary
Sinilal, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Rajeena Beevi, the defendant. The suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's failure to remit the balance court fee after being given sufficient opportunities.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiff's suit due to non-payment of the required court fees.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not comply with court requirements regarding court fees.
The plaintiff did not comply with court requirements regarding court fees.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not comply with court requirements regarding court fees.
The plaintiff did not comply with court requirements regarding court fees.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff represented. No balance court fee remitted, even after giving sufficient opportunities.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit stands rejected u/o 7 Rule 11 of the code of civil procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sinilal
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajeena Beevi
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Punchakkary G. Raveendran Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Shaji.P.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit stands rejected due to no balance court fee remitted.
Evidence:
Hence suit stands rejected u/o 7 Rule 11 of the code of civil procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sinilal vs Rajeena Beevi regarding rejection of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sinilal vs Rajeena Beevi regarding rejection of suit