Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1295/2015

Case between Sindhu Unnikrishnan vs Vinu Vincent et al regarding Execution Petition

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-11-15
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sindhu Unnikrishnan is the decree holder seeking execution against Vinu Vincent and others, who are the judgment debtors. The petition was dismissed due to the decree holder's absence during the enquiry process.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The execution petition was dismissed due to the decree holder's failure to appear for the enquiry, despite multiple chances granted by the court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed due to the decree holder's failure to appear for the enquiry, despite multiple chances granted by the court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Execution Petition of the year 2024. Not inclined to grant further time. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sindhu Unnikrishnan
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vinu Vincent
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Unnikrishnan
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manesh
Party Age
49
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreejith
Party Age
34
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jagan Abrahm M George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jaison Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Benoy K Kadavan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shilpa Miriam Verghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Akhil R Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Execution Petition filed under Order 21 Rule 10 & 11 of The Code of Civil Procedure.
Evidence:
Execution Petition of the year 2024. Not inclined to grant further time. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sindhu Unnikrishnan vs Vinu Vincent et al regarding Execution Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Sindhu Unnikrishnan vs Vinu Vincent et al regarding Execution Petition

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Mahendra Kumar. C vs Suresh. V. Varghese regarding E.P No. 199/2023
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between Cornation Curries Private Limited vs Happy Varghese et al regarding E.P No. 31/2020
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Shamughapuram Co-operative Bank Limited vs Sumathy Vijayan regarding execution petition
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Manager, DTDC Express Limited et al regarding decree satisfaction
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won