Case Summary
Sindhu Unnikrishnan and Unnikrishnan R are the plaintiffs in this case against Chakolas Spinning and Weaving Mills Private Limited. The court allowed a compromise between the parties, closing the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the compromise terms, which were found lawful, and closed the case incorporating these terms into the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the compromise terms lawful.
The court found the compromise terms lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the compromise terms lawful.
The court found the compromise terms lawful.
Supporting Evidence
The court found the compromise terms lawful.
Judgment Evidence:
Compromise terms found lawful. Closed incorporating terms of compromise. Compromise shall form part of decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sindhu Unnikrishnan
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Unnikrishnan R
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chakolas Spinning and Weaving Mills Private Limited
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- John Numpeli Junior
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Krishnapriya A.R
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rahul Kandampully
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sindhu Unnikrishnan et al vs Chakolas Spinning and Weaving Mills Private Limited regarding compromise terms
Case Code Year
Case between Sindhu Unnikrishnan et al vs Chakolas Spinning and Weaving Mills Private Limited regarding compromise terms
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement