Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1384/2023

Case between Sindhu Syamkumar et al vs Arun.P et al regarding abandonment of suit

Court
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-02-14
Duration
Case Code No.
1384
Case Closed
Fri, 02/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sindhu Syamkumar filed a suit against Arun.P and Joycee Arun. The court dismissed the suit as abandoned due to the plaintiff's failure to contact the legal representatives.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by Sindhu Syamkumar was dismissed by the court due to abandonment as the plaintiff could not contact their legal representatives.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by Sindhu Syamkumar was dismissed by the court due to abandonment as the plaintiff could not contact their legal representatives.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed as abandoned due to failure to contact legal representatives.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed as abandoned due to failure to contact legal representatives.
Supporting Evidence
The court ruled that the suit is dismissed as abandoned due to attempts to contact legal representatives being in vain.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as abandoned.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sindhu Syamkumar
Party Age
49
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arun.P
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joycee Arun
Party Age
33
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.M.R.Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Adithyan.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.S.Rajagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as abandoned.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff submitted that counsel attempted to contact the legal representatives of 1st plaintiff. But in vain. Hence suit is dismissed as abandoned.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Fri, 02/14/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won