Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 943/2023

Case between Siju Aravindan et al vs Kanayannur Taluk SNDP Union et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-11-28
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, led by Siju Aravindan, filed a suit against the defendants including Kanayannur Taluk SNDP Union. The case was dismissed as not pressed by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court found that the suit was not pressed and consequently dismissed it.
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Siju Aravindan (44 years years) Narakathuparambil, Thoppil, Thirkkakara, Kochi - 682 021 Mani K.N. (56 years years) Karimakkat House, Thirkkakara, Kochi - 682 021 Subeesh M.R (41 years years) Manathuthundil House, Vazhakkala, Kakkanad, Kochi - 682 030 Viju Divakaran (48 years years) Perekkattil House, Thoppil, Thrikkakara, Kochi - 682 021 Soman Gopalan (72 years years) Abhi Nivas, PWRA 84, Chembumukku, Kakkanad, Kochi - 682 030

Defendants

Kanayannur Taluk SNDP Union (Age not specified years) Kumaranasan Soudham, Palarivattom, Kochi - 682 025 L. Santosh (Age not specified years) Kumaranasan Soudham, Palarivattom, Kochi - 682 025 SNDP Branch No. 1000 (Age not specified years) Chembumukku, Kochi - 682 021 P.K. Anilkumar (50 years years) Puthalath House, Chembumukku, Kakkanad, Kochi-21 K. Kamalasanan (65 years years) Valliyil Thekkethil, N.G.O. Quarters, Kakkanad, Kochi - 682 021

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 28.11.2025 and the court on the same day delivered the following: JUDGMENT Plaintiff represented. Defendant No. 1 and Defendant No. 2 exparte. Defendant No. 3 to Defendant No.5 exparte. Not press memo filed. Dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Union

Similar Cases